Is it Necessary: Quality Control in Cataloging?

Muriel D. Nero, Jia He

Abstract


Catalogers and technical services departments have always struggled with how much is too much when creating and enhancing bibliographic records as well as with what physical processing is needed to make these materials shelf-ready for timely circulation.  Along with these decisions, catalogers also must address what quality control measures, if any, should be in place to guarantee resources are discoverable in the OPAC and discovery service. The authors of this paper describe their process and workflow for the quality control of tangible and electronic resources; they also discuss why quality control is performed. The importance of training cataloging staff on current cataloging rules and practices as a preventive measure to reduce mistakes is an essential part of the process.  The ultimate goal of quality control is to eliminate errors and ensure the library’s resources are accessible.


Keywords


cataloging, quality control, technical services, cataloging staff training

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bade, D. (2008). The perfect bibliographic record: Platonic ideal, rhetorical strategy or nonsense?. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 46(1), 109-133.

https://doi.org/10.1080/01639370802183081

Chen, S. (2008). Empowering student assistants in the cataloging department through innovative training: The E-Learning Courseware for Basic Cataloging (ECBC) Project. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 46(2), 221-234.

https://doi.org/10.1080/01639370802177646

Graham, P. S. (1990). Quality in cataloging: Making distinctions. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 16(4), 213-218. Retrieved from Professional Development Collection.

Hanson, H., & Schalow, J. (1999). Two aspects of quality in technical services: Automating for quick availability, and identifying problems, effecting solutions. Library Collections, Acquisitions, & Technical Services, 23(4), 433–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649055.1999.10765621

Harmon, J. C. (1996). The death of quality cataloging: Does it make a difference for library users? The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 22(4), 306-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0099-1333(96)90124-x

Hider, P., & Tan, K. C. (2008). Constructing record quality measures based on catalog use. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 46(4), 338-361. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639370802322515

Khurshid, Z. (1997). The application of TQM in cataloguing. Library Management, 18(6), 274-279. https://doi.org/10.1108/01435129710176706

McGurr, M. (2008). Improving the flow of materials in a cataloging department. Library Resources & Technical Services, 52(2), 54-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.5860/lrts.52n2.54

Paiste, M. S. (2003). Defining and achieving quality in cataloging in academic libraries: A literature review. Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services, 27(3), 327-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1464-9055(03)00069-1

Park, J., Tosaka, Y., Maszaros, S., & Lu, C. (2010). From metadata creation to metadata quality control: Continuing education needs among cataloging and Metadata professionals. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 51(3), 158-176. Retrieved from JSTOR.

Petrucciani, A. (2015). Quality of library catalogs and value of (good) catalogs. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 53(3-4), 303-313. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2014.1003669

Propas, S. W., & Johnson, S. (1998). Outsourcing, quality control, and the acquisitions professional. Library Acquisitions: Practice & Theory, 22(3), 279–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0364-6408(98)00082-9

Schultz-Jones, B., Snow, K., Miksa, S., & Hasenyager Jr, R. L. (2012). Historical and current implications of cataloguing quality for next-generation catalogues. Library Trends, 61(1), 49-82. Retrieved from Project Muse.

Sheeran, R. (1996). Maintaining the cohesive collection: The case for the local cataloger. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 22(6), 462-465. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0099-1333(96)90009-9

Soules, A. (1983). The deterioration of quality cataloging. Library Journal, 108(1), 27-29. Retrieved from Academic Search Complete.

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (n.d.). MarcEdit: An introduction to the MARC record editing software MarcEdit. Retrieved from http://guides.library.illinois.edu/c.php?g=463460&p=3168262

University of South Alabama (n.d.). University of South Alabama libraries mission statement. Retrieved from http://www.southalabama.edu/departments/library/resources/missionstate.pdf




DOI: https://doi.org/10.23974/ijol.2018.vol3.2.96

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.

Comments on this article

View all comments


Copyright (c) 2018 Muriel D. Nero, Jia He

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.